MIL-PRF-49464C
4.6.2.1.3 Rejected lots. Production lots exceeding the PDA of group A, subgroup 1 inspection, shall be rejected
and shall not be resubmitted.
4.6.2.2 Subgroup 2.
4.6.2.2.1 Sampling plan. Subgroup 2 shall be performed on an inspection lot basis. In the event of one or more
failures the lot shall be rejected.
4.6.2.2.2 Rejected lots. The rejected lots shall be segregated from new lots and those that have passed
inspection. Rejected lots shall be 100 percent reworked or scrapped. The rejected lot may be rescreened and the
defects removed. The lot may then be resubmitted to the sample plan. If one or more defects of the same type are
found in this second sample, the lot is rejected and shall not be supplied to this specification. If another defect of a
different type is found in the second sample, a rescreen for that defect is also permitted.
4.6.2.3 Subgroup 3. Subgroup 3 shall be performed on an inspection lot basis. The sampling procedure shall be
as specified in table VI. If there are one or more defects, the inspection lot shall be rejected.
4.6.2.4 Subgroup 4.
4.6.2.4.1 Sampling plan. Subgroup 4 shall be performed on a production lot basis. In the event of one or more
failures the lot shall be rejected.
4.6.2.4.2 Disposition of sample units. Sample units that have been subjected to subgroup 4 shall not be delivered
on the contract or purchase order.
TABLE VI. Group A inspection.
Test method
Requirement
Inspection
Sampling procedure
paragraph
paragraph
Subgroup 1
Thermal shock and voltage conditioning
Capacitance 1/
100% inspection
Dissipation factor 1/
Insulation resistance 1/
Dielectric withstanding voltage 1/
Subgroup 2
Visual and mechanical examination: 2/
Material
13 samples
Physical dimensions
0 failures
Interface requirements (other than physical
dimensions) 2/
Workmanship
Subgroup 3
13 samples
Bond strength
0 failures
Die shear strength
Subgroup 4
Temperature coefficient limits
13 samples
0 failures
1/ Performed as part of voltage conditioning tests.
2/ The manufacturer may request the deletion of the visual and mechanical examination provided an in-line or
process control system to assure the visual and mechanical requirements are met can be validated and
approved by the qualifying activity. Deletion of these examinations does not relieve the manufacturer from
meeting these requirements in case of dispute. If the design, material, construction, or processing of the part
is changed or if there are any quality problems, the qualifying activity may require resumption of these
examinations.
10
For Parts Inquires submit RFQ to Parts Hangar, Inc.
© Copyright 2015 Integrated Publishing, Inc.
A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business